Emily Griffiths
Two conversations in particular stand out from my memory of Saturday's event. I believe these two conversations say a great deal about how gender, gender roles, and gender equality are viewed today. And, unfortunately, it's not good news. (At the risk of this post turning into pages long, I will discuss only one for today.)
The first remark that stands out vividly in my mind from Saturday, and which has been haunting me since, I came across as such:
Many young couples were letting their children play in the fountain near where we were "washing" laundry. I approached a woman, probably in her mid-thirties, to tell her about the NWP. As soon as I reached the word feminist (as in, "we're a feminist organization"), she threw her hand up and said firmly, "no, I am not a feminist. Not interested." Shocked, I stood there stupidly for a moment; I think I may have said, "oh. Okay," before stumbling on to a more receptive candidate, but when I returned to my fellow NWP volunteers and relayed what had happened, I exclaimed, "but she has a vagina! How can you not be a feminist when you have a vagina?!"
I have read about women refusing to identify with the word "feminist" but have never encountered it first hand. I've been thinking a lot about this woman. I came to the following realization: "feminism" does not unite all women, whether they have vagina's or not. This, inevitably, led to the "WHY?!" for which I have come to two possible conclusions.
1. "feminism" has a political subtext that women do not feel comfortable identifying with.
2. "feminism," as a word, has been twisted and perverted by patriarchal society to mean shrill, man-hating, serious, and sexless among other negative and unattractive things.
Like Inga Muscio, I believe women deserve to be empowered and united, not "divided and conquered". If "feminism" isn't the word to do it, fine - but what else is there? Beautiful, powerful women out there, help me figure this out!
